ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification and evaluation of pyrimidine based CDK6 inhibitors against glioblastoma using integrated computational approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated experimental and computational evaluation of Anagallis foemina derived terpenoids against carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Discovery of potent thymidine phosphorylase inhibitors from Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. ex Klotzsch with experimental validation and computational analysis.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Review
- Informing development of brain cancer therapies within "preclinical trials" using ex vivo patient tumors.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026Review
- A Pyrimidine-Based Tubulin Inhibitor Shows Potent Anti-Glioblastoma Activity In Vitro and In Vivo.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrative analysis of polo-like kinase family identifies a prognostic signature and validates PLK2 as a therapeutic target in glioma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are crucial for controlling the cell cycle, and many malignancies are linked to CDK dysfunction. Therefore, CDKs are desirable targets for cancer treatment. Since abnormal expression of CDK4/6 is the etiology of glioblastoma, it is imperative to investigate the mechanism underlying CDK4/6 selectivity for inhibitors compared to CDK1/2, another member of the family. This study used a range of molecular docking and bioinformatics techniques to characterize the specific efficacy of ligands as inhibitors and their interaction with CDK6. Ligand-based virtual screening was performed using 6OQL'ligand. Using Maestro 12.5, ligands were docked to the interaction site of CDK6 with a reference co-crystallized ligand (CCL). The ligands were analyzed for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET). Using density functional theory (DFT) analysis, the selected ligands were found to have substantial stability. One ligand, Mol_370, which closely resembles the characteristics of CCL, was simulated using molecular dynamics. The results revealed that amino acids and ligands interact at the CDK6 inhibitor-binding site via typical chemical interactions, such as hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds, as demonstrated by the docking data. MD simulations revealed that Mol_ 370 is compatible with CCL, leading to changes in both structure and function. In conclusion, this study offers significant insights into the development and refinement of inhibitors that can successfully target CDK6 and produce novel cancer treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.