Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659718›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel framework integrating GeoAI and human perceptions to estimate walkability in Wuhan, China.

Xue Yang, Tianyu Li, Yanjia Cao, Xiaoyun Zheng, Luliang Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xue Yang *School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Tianyu Li *Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yanjia CaoDepartment of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. yanjiac@hku.hk.
Xiaoyun ZhengSchool of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Luliang TangState Key Laboratory for Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42271449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence shows enhanced walking environment promotes overall physical activities and further alleviates the risk of chronic diseases and mental disorders. Current walkability research is limited by traditional GIS methods that fail to capture micro-level details and human perceptions. Additionally, existing image segmentation techniques return low accuracy when extracting complex street environment features. Therefore, we developed a hierarchical evaluation framework for urban walkability with high precision image segmentation techniques, and subjective measurements on four first-level indicators (greenness, openness, crowding, safety) and their corresponding second-level indicators. An entropy weight method was constructed to quantify the indicators based on questionnaires from 120 volunteers. Furthermore, we developed Detail-Strengthened High-Resolution Network (DS-HRNet), a deep learning model that demonstrates a 15% improvement in street scene segmentation performance compared to existing models. Using the newly developed deep learning model, we analyzed 113,900 street view images in central Wuhan City, China. Our walkability results revealed spatial heterogeneity across the city, characterized by substantial disparities between adjacent areas, particularly in commercial areas. Subsequent socioeconomic analysis demonstrated that better walkability exists in areas of higher socioeconomic status but lower proportion of non-local residents. This walkability inequality may further lead to health disparities through its influence on physical activity and social interaction.

Indexed as

Environment DesignGeographic Information SystemsPerceptionWalkingChinaCitiesDeep LearningExerciseFemaleHumansSocioeconomic FactorsPerceived walkabilityPublic healthSocioeconomic disparitiesStreet view imageryWalking environment quality

Identifiers

PMID40659718
PMCPMC12259924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.