ArticleScientific reports2025
How to predict early mortality in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral vaccination-induced brain-resident memory CD8+ T cells durably protect mice against intracranial malignancy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Development of Nomograms to Predict the Probability of Recurrence at Specific Sites in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma is the most common malignant tumor, with a large patient population. Metastatic melanoma typically occurs in sites such as lymph nodes, skin, lungs, liver, brain, and bones. This metastatic spread often indicates advanced disease, with significantly decreased treatment efficacy and patient survival rates. Accurately predicting the early death (six months) rates of patients with metastatic melanoma to guide the selection of optimal treatment strategies is an urgent clinical issue in need of resolution. Patient demographic and clinical information for this study was extracted from the SEER database. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to screen for independent risk factors. Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curve were used to validate the accuracy of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the model's benefit to patients. Finally, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to show differences in patient survival across risk groups. A total of 1109 patients were included in the study and randomly allocated to a training cohort (n = 777) and a validation cohort (n = 332). Logistic regression analysis identified six variables as independent factors influencing short-term survival in patients with metastatic melanoma, which were used to construct a nomogram. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated good performance of the nomogram in both the training cohort (AUC = 0.755) and the validation cohort (AUC = 0.694). The calibration curve showed good fit. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that patients can derive significant benefit from using this nomogram. We have successfully developed and well validated a nomogram that accurately predicts early death (6 months) in patients with transformational melanoma. This can assist clinicians in choosing better clinical strategies for their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.