ArticleScientific reports2025
The use of acoustic emission technique in MWD for mine to mill approach as a smart tool for sustainable mining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Aggregate Type on Noise Characteristics and Emissions During the Crushing Process.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An intelligent approach to predict the drilling penetration rate using acoustic emission technique (AET).Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Mine-to-Mill (MTM) approach is crucial in mining due to the high energy consumption and costs of comminution processes like crushing and grinding, which account for over 50% of total energy use. Optimizing these processes, starting from blasting, enhances efficiency and profitability. Accurate rock mass characterization is key to blasting optimization, and Monitoring While Drilling (MWD) provides real-time geotechnical data foron-the-spot adjustments. Acoustic emission monitoring, a leading MWD technique combined with intelligent models, offers promising results in rock characterization. This study employed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model to predict rock mass properties from drilling acoustic signals. The model demonstrated high accuracy, achieving R² values of 0.976 (training) and 0.808 (testing). The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) was 4.36% and 29.52%, while the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) reached 0.0486 and 0.141, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was 0.021 and 0.103, and the Mean Squared Error (MSE) was 0.0024 and 0.0199 for training and testing, respectively. These results confirm the model's reliability in estimating rock characteristics. Integrating acoustic emission monitoring with advanced modeling can enhance MTM strategies, reducing energy consumption, operational costs, and environmental impact in mining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.