ArticleScientific reports2025
A large language model based pipeline for extracting information from patient complaint and anamnesis in clinical notes for severity assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- New to cohort, not new to care: leveraging historical data in HIV clinical cohorts in the United States.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Automated Review of Patient Records: Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models for Identifying Incident Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy at Scale.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Enhancing complaint locations prediction with image-space embedding representations and customized large language models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A real-world feasibility evaluation of LLM-based clinical prediction: emergency department return visit admission across two academic medical centers.Research square · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Clinical Narrative Processing: Methods, Applications, and Challenges.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Large Language Model Automated Extraction of Clinical Signs and Symptoms From Emergency Department Reports for Machine Learning Prediction Models: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying patients with critical illness in emergency departments (EDs) is an ongoing challenge, partly due to the limited information available at the time of admission. The clinical notes in patient records have already received attention for the value of improving prediction. Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their promising performance. However, the utilization of LLMs for analyzing clinical notes has not been extensively investigated. To improve the severity assessment of illness and the prediction of triage level, we developed a pipeline for utilizing LLMs (e.g. ChatGLM-2, GLM-4 and Alpaca-2) to extract information from patient complaint and anamnesis in clinical notes. In this pipeline, a LLM is supplied with the text input including complaint and anamnesis of a patient, where the input is further constructed by a prompt template, in-context learning (ICL), and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Then a severity score is extracted from the LLM, which is further integrated into a predictive model for improving its performance. We demonstrated the effectiveness of our pipeline based on the patient records derived from Chinese Emergency Triage, Assessment, and Treatment (CETAT) database. The extracted score were be incorporated into logistic regression as a predictor. At early stage, as vital signs were typically not yet measured, the predictive value of patient complaint and anamnesis was illustrated (evidenced by an improvement in AUC-ROC from 0.746 to 0.802). At later stage, vital signs became available, the enhancements in prediction attributable to the score were weaker, but still was observed with statistical significance in most cases. The recent LLMs are capable of extracting valuable information from clinical notes for identifying critical illness. The effectiveness has been illustrated in our study. It is still necessary to develop more efficient methods based on LLMs in order to achieve better performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.