Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659626›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Dual stream graph augmented transformer model integrating BERT and GNNs for context aware fake news detection.

Hejamadi Rama Moorthy, N J Avinash, N S Krishnaraj Rao, K R Raghunandan, Radhakrishna Dodmane, Jeremy Joseph Blum, Lubna A Gabralla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hejamadi Rama MoorthyNitte (Deemed to be University), Nitte Institute of Professional Education (NIPE), Department of Computer Applications, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
N J AvinashDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Mangalore Institute of Technology and Engineering, Moodabidre, Karnataka, India.
N S Krishnaraj RaoNitte (Deemed to be University), NMAM Institute of Technology (NMAMIT), Department of Information Science and Engineering, Nitte, Karnataka, India. krishnaraj.rao@nitte.edu.in.
K R RaghunandanNitte (Deemed to be University), NMAM Institute of Technology (NMAMIT), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Nitte, Karnataka, India. raghunandan@nitte.edu.in.
Radhakrishna DodmaneNitte (Deemed to be University), NMAM Institute of Technology (NMAMIT), Department of Computer & Communication Engineering, Nitte, Karnataka, India.
Jeremy Joseph BlumDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, USA.
Lubna A GabrallaDepartment of Computer Science, Applied College, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of misinformation across digital platforms has highlighted the critical need for advanced fake news detection mechanisms. Traditional methods primarily rely on textual analysis, often neglecting the structural patterns of news dissemination, which play a crucial role in determining credibility. To address this limitation, this study proposes a Dual-Stream Graph-Augmented Transformer Model, integrating BERT for deep textual representation and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to model the propagation structure of misinformation. The objective is to enhance fake news detection by leveraging both linguistic and network-based features. The proposed method employs Graph Attention Networks (GAT) and Graph Transformers to extract contextual relationships, while an attention-based fusion mechanism effectively integrates textual and graph embeddings for classification. The model is implemented using PyTorch and Hugging Face Transformers, with experiments conducted on the FakeNewsNet dataset, which includes news articles, user interactions, and source metadata. Evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC indicate superior performance, with an accuracy of 99%, outperforming baseline models such as Bi-LSTM and RoBERTa-GCN. The study concludes that incorporating graph-based propagation features significantly improves fake news detection, providing a robust, scalable, and context-aware solution. Future enhancements will focus on refining credibility assessment mechanisms and extending the model to support multilingual and multimodal misinformation detection across diverse digital platforms.

Indexed as

BERTContext-Aware analysisFake news detectionGraph neural networksTransformer model

Identifiers

PMID40659626
PMCPMC12259997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.