Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659612›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

The Helicobacter pylori AI-clinician harnesses artificial intelligence to personalise H. pylori treatment recommendations.

Kyle Higgins, Olga P Nyssen, Joshua Southern, Ivan Laponogov, AIDA CONSORTIUM, Dennis Veselkov, Javier P Gisbert, Tania Fleitas Kanonnikoff, Kirill Veselkov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Advances in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Microbiological Testing].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Advances in the Management of RefractoryGastro hep advances · 2026
    Review
  9. Progress in immunotherapy forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kyle Higgins *Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0265-1395
Olga P Nyssen *Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-9310
Joshua SouthernDepartment of Computing, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ivan LaponogovDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
AIDA CONSORTIUM
Dennis VeselkovDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Javier P GisbertGastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain. javier.p.gisbert@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-3445
Tania Fleitas KanonnikoffInstituto Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA (INCLIVA), Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. tfleitas@incliva.es.
Kirill VeselkovDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. kirill.veselkov04@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1164-0359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the most common carcinogenic pathogen globally and the leading cause of gastric cancer. Here, we develop a reinforcement learning-based AI Clinician system to personalise treatment selection and evaluate its ability to improve eradication success compared to clinician-prescribed therapies. The model is trained and internally validated on 38,049 patients from the retrospective European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management (Hp-EuReg), using independent state deep Q-learning (isDQN) to recommend optimal therapies based on patient characteristics such as age, sex, antibiotic allergies, country, and pre-treatment indication. In internal validation using real-world Hp-EuReg data, AI-recommended therapies achieve a 94.1% success rate (95% CI: 93.2-95.0%) versus 88.1% (95% CI: 87.7-88.4%) for clinician-prescribed therapies not aligned with AI suggestions-an improvement of 6.0%. Results are replicated in an external validation cohort (n = 7186), confirming generalisability. The AI system identifies optimal treatment strategies in key subgroups: 65% (n = 24,923) are recommended bismuth-based therapies, and 15% (n = 5898) non-bismuth quadruple therapies. Random forest modelling identifies region and concurrent medications as patient-specific drivers of AI recommendations. With nearly half the global population likely to contract H. pylori, this approach lays the foundation for future prospective clinical validation and shows the potential of AI to support clinical decision-making, enhance outcomes, and reduce gastric cancer burden.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArtificial IntelligenceHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriPrecision MedicineAdultAgedBismuthEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBismuth

Identifiers

PMID40659612
PMCPMC12259899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.