ArticleJournal of microbiology and biotechnology2025
Rapid Screening of Plastic-Degrading Enzymes Using an Optimized Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Platform.
Article in Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accumulation of plastic waste poses a significant environmental challenge, necessitating the development of efficient plastic-degrading enzymes for bioremediation and recycling. However, traditional enzyme engineering approaches rely on microbial expression systems and are time-consuming and prone to unintended interactions between host cells and recombinant circuits. To address these limitations, a cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) platform was developed for rapidly screening plastic-degrading enzymes. Using CFPS, cutinase and PET-degrading enzymes (PETases) were successfully synthesized, and their catalytic activities were assessed using polymer-containing agar plates. Clear degradation halos were observed for cutinase and PETase on polycaprolactone (PCL)-containing and bis (2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET)-containing plates, respectively. The optimization of CFPS conditions revealed that enzyme synthesis efficacy was higher at room temperature than at 37°C. The screening of PETase variants (C3 N1377, Mipa-P, and C5 N1251), synthesized using the CFPS platform, demonstrated that the catalytic activity of Mipa-P was the highest and surpassed that of IsPETase. This finding was further validated through purified enzyme analysis. Our results establish CFPS as a rapid, scalable, and cell-free alternative platform for screening and optimizing plastic-degrading enzymes, facilitating advancements in enzymatic plastic recycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.