Observational studyEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2025
Single vs. dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the Hostile registry.
Observational study in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Following Transcatheter Structural Heart Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsSingle antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) has been shown to be a safer alternative to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, antithrombotic therapy for TAVI patients with severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains an underexplored area. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of SAPT and DAPT in this high-risk patient population. METHODS AND
resultsThe HOSTILE registry was a multicentre, international, observational study including 1707 consecutive patients with hostile femoral access undergoing TAVI in 28 international centres. Among 573 patients without AF treated through transfemoral or non-thoracic alternative approach, 144 received SAPT and 429 DAPT after TAVI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the propensity-adjusted rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack. The primary safety endpoint was the propensity-adjusted rate of major bleeding. Outcomes were reported at 30 days and 12 months. Dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a non-significant reduction in MACE at 30 days [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-2.18; P = 0.59] and at 12 months (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.35-2.24; P = 0.80) compared with SAPT, but with a significant interaction between antiplatelet strategy and PAD severity (P = 0.01), suggesting a greater benefit of DAPT in patients with a high PAD severity. Dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with reduced all-cause death at 12 months (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.47; P < 0.001) but not at 30 days (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05-1.22; P = 0.09) compared with SAPT. There was no difference in major bleeding at 30 days (P = 0.13) or 12 months (P = 0.10) between groups. There were no differences between groups in any bleeding at 30 days (P = 0.16) or 12 months (P = 0.17).
conclusionIn TAVI patients with severe PAD, DAPT was associated with a trend towards improved outcomes compared with SAPT, particularly in those with higher PAD severity. These findings, including the observed reduction in 1-year mortality with DAPT, warrant further investigation in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.