ArticleBMJ open2025
Postmarketing adverse events of efgartigimod alfa: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- BCMA-directed mRNA CAR T cell therapy for myasthenia gravis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Efgartigimod-alfa therapy in acetylcholine receptor antibody myasthenia gravis: Romanian experience.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance analysis of FcRn antagonists in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: A disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Safety profile of complement C5 inhibitors and FcRn inhibitors in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: analysis of the FAERS database and disease-gene interaction network.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEfgartigimod alfa is an important novel drug for the treatment of myasthenia gravis. However, postmarketing safety data for this drug is limited, underscoring the need for comprehensive safety evaluations in real-world populations. DESIGN AND
settingThis study aims to identify adverse event (AE) signals associated with efgartigimod alfa using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, with a focus on evaluating unexpected AEs not previously observed in clinical trials. AE reports with efgartigimod alfa as the primary suspect from the first quarter of 2022 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were extracted. OUTCOME MEASURES: Signal strength was assessed using Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network methods at the Preferred Term level.
resultsA total of 1403 valid cases were retrieved. Urinary tract infection was the most reported AE, while procedural headache demonstrated the strongest signal across all four algorithms. Sepsis, atrial fibrillation and transient ischaemic attack were significant unexpected AEs. The median onset time for AEs was 57.00 days, with cumulative incidence of AEs reaching 37.31% at 30 days and 64.25% at 100 days post-treatment initiation.
conclusionsOur analysis of real-world data from the FAERS database revealed that most significant AEs were consistent with clinical trials, but some unexpected AEs were additionally identified, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.