Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659399›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Surgery or radiotherapy for early-stage cancer study (SORT) target trial protocol: stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with curative intent versus surgical resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Eva Kagenaar, David G Lugo-Palacios, Andrew Hutchings, Ajay Aggarwal, Stephen O'Neill, Bernard Rachet, John Edwards, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Richard Grieve, Surgery or Radiotherapy Study (SORT) group

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eva KagenaarDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.
David G Lugo-PalaciosDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.
Andrew HutchingsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ajay AggarwalDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.
Stephen O'NeillLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Bernard RachetLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5837-7773
John EdwardsSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Corinne Faivre-FinnClinical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Richard GrieveDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK richard.grieve@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-1301
Surgery or Radiotherapy Study (SORT) group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRandomised controlled trials have aimed to assess the effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with curative intent versus surgical resection for individuals diagnosed with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but have failed to recruit sufficient numbers of patients. Non-randomised studies for early-stage NSCLC have reported mixed outcomes following curative SABR versus surgical resection, but did not fully address confounding by indication. The Surgery Or RadioTherapy for early-stage cancer study (SORT) will assess the comparative effectiveness of SABR with curative intent versus surgical resection for NSCLC with a target trial emulation approach, as this can reduce biases in observational studies that aim to estimate the causal effect of interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The SORT study will use the National Cancer Registry for individuals diagnosed with early-stage NSCLC in England during 2015-2020 (inclusive) who received SABR with curative intent or surgical resection. These data will be linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, National Radiotherapy Data Set and the Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy dataset to obtain information on clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and the treatment received. This target trial emulation will define study population eligibility criteria and regimens for SABR with curative intent and surgical resection. We will reduce the risk of residual confounding with instrumental variable analyses that will exploit geographical variation across the National Health Service in England in the use of SABR with curative intent versus surgical resection for early-stage NSCLC. The primary outcome will be 3-year all-cause mortality after treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes will include 3-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-month all-cause and lung-cancer mortality, time to death, numbers of hospitalisations, incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee (reference number 29 717-1). Results will be disseminated to clinicians, patients, policy-makers and researchers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryEnglandHumansNeoplasm StagingObservational Studies as TopicPneumonectomyRegistriesTreatment OutcomeElectronic Health RecordsHEALTH ECONOMICSLung NeoplasmsRadiation oncologySURGERY

Identifiers

PMID40659399
PMCPMC12258277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.