ArticleBMJ open2025
Comparative analysis of HIV data completeness in Haiti's iSanté Plus Electronic Medical Record system across children, adolescents and adults: a cross-sectional evaluation of 2016-2022 data.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applying Machine Learning to Predict Loss to Follow-Up Among People Living With HIV in Haiti Using a National Electronic Medical Record Cohort.International journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate and compare documentation completeness of HIV-related data by age group (children, adolescents and adults) in Haiti's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system.
designCross-sectional evaluation.
settingEMR data for 36 965 enrolment visits, and 123 608 return visits from 58 facilities in Haiti (from 2016 to 2022).
participantsChildren, adolescents and adults accessing HIV care and treatment services in Haiti. MAIN EXPOSURE MEASURE: Health facility attendance for HIV-related healthcare.
main outcome measureLevel of data completeness, as a measure of data quality. We developed Composite Completeness Scores (CCS scores) to measure data completeness. Lower scores meant lower completeness. Generalised linear models were used to investigate factors associated with completeness.
resultsAt the enrolment visit, most patients were adults (81.6%) and female (56.7%). Most facilities were health centres (75.9%). The overall average enrolment visit CCS score was 54.0%. At enrolment, being a child (CCS score difference=-7.08, 95% CI: -11.31 to -2.86) and a more recent year of enrolment (-6.01, 95% CI: -11.69 to -0.33) were significantly associated with lower completeness scores than being an adult and having an earlier year of enrolment, respectively. The overall average return visit CCS score was 49.6%. At the return visit, children (-6.76, 95% CI: -10.07 to -3.45) had significantly lower average completeness scores than adults. For first viral load documentation, children had lower odds of completeness compared with adults (adjusted OR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.28). Sex, year of enrolment, facility ownership (public, private, mixed), total patient volume and duration of EMR use were not significantly associated with completeness of documentation at the enrolment and return visits.
conclusionsWe observed disparities in electronic data completeness by age group, which may be indicative of digital health disparities. Documentation was particularly poor among children and declined over time for enrolment visits. Further research is needed to understand and address these documentation gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.