Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659391›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Impact of proactively inviting people with advanced cancer to talk about the end of life: a randomised clinical trial protocol.

Joaquim Julià-Torras, Aina García-Salanova, Cristina Monforte-Royo, María Jimeno Ariztia, Albert Balaguer, Iris Crespo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06420609 (Efficacy of a Proactive Approach to Death Thoughts in People With Advanced Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06420609 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Efficacy of a Proactive Approach to Death Thoughts in People With Advanced Cancer: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Internacional de CatalunyaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled168ConditionsDeath, Advanced CancerArmsGo-TAD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joaquim Julià-TorrasInstitut Català d'Oncologia Badalona, Badalona, Spain.
Aina García-SalanovaNursing Department, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9856-2542
Cristina Monforte-RoyoNursing Department, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8334-4623
María Jimeno AriztiaMedicine Department, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.
Albert BalaguerMedicine Department, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.
Iris CrespoPsychology Department, School of Medicine and Health Science, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain icrespo@uic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is evidence that talking about the end of life with patients facing a life-threatening disease is not upsetting, and in fact, it may even be beneficial. However, both patients and health professionals can find it difficult to engage in these conversations. The aim of this clinical trial is to explore whether proactively inviting people with advanced cancer to share their thoughts about death and dying is distressing for them, comparing the impact with usual clinical practice (ie, a reactive approach to these issues). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial involving six palliative care units in Spain will be conducted. Each unit will recruit participants for both the experimental and control groups. Units will be randomised to determine the order in which they will begin implementing the intervention: GO-TaD (Give the Opportunity to Talk about Death thoughts). The trial will involve six sequences and seven periods (steps), with four patients per period (patients in each period will be different). The primary outcome will be emotional distress, assessed with the Detecting Emotional Distress scale. The following secondary variables will also be analysed: hopelessness, using the Beck Hopelessness Scale; quality of the patient-professional relationship, with the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9); and quality of life, with the Palliative Outcome Scale . The trial will follow the CONSORT extension for stepped-wedge cluster randomised designs. The primary analysis will include all eligible patients, applying mixed-effects regression models for binary results and mixed linear models for continuous data. Results will be reported as risk differences and ORs, with 95% confidence intervals. Analyses by sub-groups of interest (eg, age, gender, type of palliative care unit) will also be conducted. All analyses will be performed using R. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the researchers' university and all participating centres. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open access publications, academic conferences and presentations to clinical audiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06420609.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathCommunicationNeoplasmsPalliative CareTerminal CareFemaleHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPsychological DistressQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpainONCOLOGYPALLIATIVE CAREQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID40659391
PMCPMC12258318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.