Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659359›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

Effects of inbreeding on balancing selection: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Colin Olito, Tim Connallon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Colin OlitoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lund University, Lund 223 62, Skåne, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6883-0367
Tim ConnallonSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, 25 Rainforest Walk, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1962-4951

Funding

ERC ERC-StG-101117517Swedish Research Council 2022-03603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balancing selection is a potentially important factor in the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness and, alongside recessive deleterious mutations, the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Classic population genetics theory predicts that inbreeding restricts the range of conditions leading to balancing selection. For example, in models of heterozygote advantage, the classic theory shows that inbreeding reduces the parameter conditions for balancing selection by a factor of 1-F, where F is Wright's inbreeding coefficient. However, without a model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations or genotypes, this classic theory tells us little about the actual probability that new or segregating mutations meet criteria for balancing selection. Here, we develop an extension of Fisher's geometric model with which we explore how inbreeding affects the probability of balancing selection due to heterozygote advantage and its contribution to genetic variance for fitness. When taking the distribution of fitness effects among new, adaptive, and established mutations into account, we find that the prevalence of balancing selection is consistently, and often substantially, below the 1-F baseline implied by classic theory provided that most mutations have phenotypic effects that are small. The reduction is consistently greater for established mutations relative to adaptive mutations, which reinforces the idea that balanced genetic polymorphisms are far more likely to occur in outbred than inbred species. We discuss the implications of our results for studies of genetic variation for fitness and genome scans for signals of balancing selection.

Indexed as

InbreedingModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsGenetic FitnessGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationHeterozygoteMutationbalancing selectionFisher's geometric modelfitnessgenetic varianceheterozygote advantageinbreedinginbreeding depression

Identifiers

PMID40659359
PMCPMC12406006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.