Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659023›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2025

The potential impact of reductions in international donor funding on tuberculosis in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study.

Rebecca A Clark, C Finn McQuaid, Alexandra S Richards, Roel Bakker, Tom Sumner, Tomos O Prŷs-Jones, Rein M G J Houben, Richard G White, Katherine C Horton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A model for the epidemiological impact of tuberculosis policy options.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Implications of year 1 Trump Administration policies for Americans' lung health.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca A ClarkDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
C Finn McQuaidDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Alexandra S RichardsDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Roel BakkerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Tom SumnerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Tomos O Prŷs-JonesDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rein M G J HoubenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Richard G WhiteDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Katherine C HortonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; TB Modelling Group and TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: katherine.horton@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis programmes in many settings rely heavily on international donor funding. In 2025, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was dismantled, and other countries announced cuts to overseas development assistance. We quantified the potential epidemiological impacts on the tuberculosis burden attributable to these reductions in funding.

methodsWe calibrated a deterministic tuberculosis model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission, progression, and care to epidemiological indicators in selected low-income and middle-income countries. Calibration was done with the history matching with emulation method, implemented with the hmer package in R and the Approximate Bayesian computation Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. We projected three future scenarios with the following assumptions: that levels of funding in 2024 would continue, that USAID funding would be terminated from 2025, and that additional reductions in funding through The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria would occur (alongside termination of funding from USAID) in line with current donor announcements from 2025. We assumed a reduction in tuberculosis treatment initiation rates proportional to budget reductions for each scenario, estimating cumulative excess episodes of symptomatic tuberculosis and tuberculosis deaths for each scenario.

findingsWe modelled 79 countries, representing 91% of global tuberculosis incidence and 90% of global tuberculosis mortality in 2023. Our modelling suggested that termination of USAID funding might lead to 1·4 million (95% uncertainty interval 1·1-1·7) excess tuberculosis episodes and 537 700 (451 900-662 300) excess deaths by 2035. Further reductions in funding in line with current announcements by the USA, France, the UK, and Germany could lead to 2·8 million (2·1-3·7), 257 600 (192 500-332 900), 206 000 (153 900-266 100), and 124 700 (93 200-161 000), additional episodes, respectively, of symptomatic tuberculosis and 1·0 million (0·8-1·3), 90 500 (72 400-112 800), 72 400 (57 900-90 100), and 43 800 (35 000-54 500) additional tuberculosis deaths, respectively, in the same period, relative to the scenario of termination of USAID funding.

interpretationWe estimate substantial potential impacts on tuberculosis morbidity and mortality due to reductions in international donor funding. Expanded support from domestic and international donors is essential to address immediate gaps in services for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInternational CooperationTuberculosisGlobal HealthHumansUnited StatesUnited States Agency for International Development

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.