Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40658918›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP

Innovations and Hiring Improvements to Address Public Health Workforce Recruitment.

Emilie R Madsen, Paulani Mui, Beth Resnick, Valerie A Yeager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilie R MadsenAuthor Affiliations: Indiana University Indianapolis, School of Liberal Arts, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Madsen); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Ms Mui and Dr Resnick ); and Indiana University Indianapolis, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Yeager).ORCID 0000-0003-1547-1326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study engaged state and local health agency employees involved in the hiring process to examine the impact of hiring laws and civil service requirements on recruitment processes. Additionally, we identified innovative approaches to improve recruitment.

designKey informant cross-sectional qualitative study.

settingState and local U.S. governmental public health agencies.

participantsHealth department hiring managers, human resources/workforce development directors and assistant directors, program managers, deputy commissioners, and other HR representatives.

main outcome measuresExperiences and perceptions of public health hiring approaches, processes, and civil service requirements.

resultsThree themes emerged as solutions and innovations for public health agency recruitment: marketing strategies, organizational workforce development changes, and applicant experience improvements. Marketing strategies to improve recruitment included the expanded use of job wrapping and social media platforms. Organizational workforce development for recruitment and retention initiatives included paid fellowship programs, salary comparisons and market adjustments, expanded benefits, and the enhanced role of HR teams. Discussion of civil service requirements and hiring laws revealed that organizational and governance factors, such as hiring authority, were perceived as more consequential to effective recruitment than specific components of the law.

conclusionsOrganizations should improve inefficient recruitment and hiring processes and systems where possible. Much of this is achievable through quality improvement initiatives rather than legal or regulatory changes. However, tracking the hiring process to identify inefficiencies is essential, as barriers likely differ across agencies and states. Finding ways to shorten the applicant review timeframe and improve communication with applicants throughout the hiring process may yield more successful recruitment efforts. Lastly, Public Health Infrastructure Grant (PHIG) funding and programming have led to recruitment innovations. Flexibility to adapt recruitment approaches to changing workforce and labor market dynamics is needed for an adequate workforce with the capacity to address foundational needs and public health challenges.

Indexed as

Health WorkforcePersonnel SelectionPublic HealthCross-Sectional StudiesHumansQualitative ResearchUnited StatesWorkforcecivil servicegovernmental public healthhiring lawsinnovationspublic health infrastructure grantrecruitment

Identifiers

PMID40658918
PMCPMC12527800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.