ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025
Porous Decellularized Nerve Grafts Facilitate Recellularization and Nerve Regeneration in a Rat Model of Critical Long-Gap Peripheral Nerve Injury.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hydrogel ionic circuit electrical stimulation system to restore denervated muscle following long-gap peripheral nerve injury.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Silk-Derived 3D-Bioprinted Scaffolds for Neural Repair and Nerve Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-guided nanocomposite hydrogel injection to enhance nerve repair via temporal delivery of a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Article
- Porous Decellularized Nerve Grafts Facilitate Recellularization and Nerve Regeneration in a Rat Model of Critical Long-Gap Peripheral Nerve Injury.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Severe peripheral nerve injury (PNI) requiring nerve graft remains a clinical challenge due to limitations associated with currently available grafts. While decellularized nerve grafts (DNGs) are commonly used, their efficacy is largely restricted to short-gap repairs due to their acellular and dense structure, which poses a persistent challenge in the treatment of critical long-gap nerve defects. It is hypothesized that making porous DNGs (PDNGs) can create a suitable microenvironment that would facilitate the cell infiltration, recellularization, and further axonal growth to enhance nerve regeneration. In this study, PDNGs are generated and their ability are evaluated to support cell proliferation and penetration in vitro. Their potential to promote nerve regeneration in vivo using a rat model of sciatic nerve transection followed by implantation of a 30 mm-long graft is further evaluated. It is found that PDNGs facilitated greater cellular infiltration within the grafts and enhanced angiogenesis compared to the traditional compact DNGs. In vivo analysis further reveals thicker myelin sheaths in the PDNG group, along with improved axonal alignment. Taken together, PDNGs enhanced nerve regeneration by reorganizing the porous structure into an extracellular matrix that supported cell infiltration, revascularization, and remyelination, all of which contribute to nerve repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.