ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Dynamic neuroplasticity of language networks: The intersection of bilingualism and epilepsy.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Burden of Epilepsy: The Contribution of Seizures (AES 2025 Presidential Symposium).Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- The role of social context in cognitive and neurobehavioural outcomes in epilepsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Are bilingual language networks flexible enough to dynamically adapt to neurological insult? We examined language lateralization in 24 bilingual and 46 monolingual adults with temporal lobe epilepsy using functional MRI. In a group of primarily early sequential bilingual patients, the first acquired language (L1) showed more bilateral lateralization than in monolingual patients, with no effect of seizure onset laterality. In contrast, the second-acquired language (L2) was more bilateral in the presence of left hemisphere epilepsy and more left-lateralized in right hemisphere epilepsy. Most notably, in left hemisphere epilepsy, seizure onset closer to L2 acquisition was associated with more right-lateralized L2 representation. These findings suggest a compensatory process in which L2 networks strengthen in the hemisphere opposite the seizure focus, potentially reflecting neural adaptation in early bilingualism. Conversely, L1 appears to have less dynamic reorganization in response to neurological insult. Together, these findings highlight the importance of timing in both language experience and neurological stress in shaping language network organization. They support the view that the bilingual brain is not simply the sum of two monolingual systems, but a dynamic and unique system marked by high interindividual variability, in which divergence between languages may emerge under certain experience- and context-dependent conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.