Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40658855›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Dissociable glucocorticoid and noradrenergic effects on parochial cooperation and competition in intergroup conflict.

Damon Dashti, Luca M Lüpken, Mohammad Seidisarouei, Paul A G Forbes, Alfons Schnitzler, Tobias Kalenscher

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Dissociable glucocorticoid and noradrenergic effects on parochial cooperation and competition in intergroup conflict.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Damon Dashti *Comparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-1082-8862
Luca M Lüpken *Comparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7770-248X
Mohammad SeidisaroueiComparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
Paul A G ForbesComparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
Alfons SchnitzlerInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-7939
Tobias KalenscherComparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-9020

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) DFG-KA 2675/7-1EC | Horizon Europe | Excellent Science | HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) 101107160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress changes social behavior, yet its effects remain contradictory. Traditionally, stress was thought to trigger an antagonistic fight-or-flight response aimed at eliminating the stressor. However, recent studies have revealed the opposite response, tend-and-befriend, where individuals prosocially invest in their social network in exchange for support and mutual protection. We hypothesize that stress does not promote one response over the other; instead, it stimulates both behaviors, dissociable on the neuropharmacological level and moderated by social context. In a placebo-controlled, double-blind psychopharmacological study, we administered hydrocortisone and yohimbine-alone or in combination-to manipulate the actions of the main stress hormone cortisol and the arousal transmitter noradrenaline. Participants then made decisions in an intergroup conflict task. They teamed up with others to form an in-group and played against multiple out-groups. Notably, out-group members initiated financial harm to in-group participants before these responded. Participants then chose either to 1) maximize their own payoff, 2) cooperatively increase the payoff of their in-group, or 3) increase the in-group's payoff while competitively decreasing that of the out-group. Consistent with our hypotheses, glucocorticoid activation increased generosity toward the in-group, whereas noradrenergic activation increased parochial competition, i.e., prosocial in-group support combined with hostility toward the out-group. These findings challenge the dichotomy between fight-or-flight and tend-and-befriend, suggesting stress-related behavior is neither static nor one-directional, but shaped by the relative dominance of cortisol versus noradrenaline in the neurohormonal stress response and by intergroup dynamics. We highlight broader societal implications, offering a potential biological mechanism underlying the self-perpetuating cycle of intergroup conflict.

Indexed as

Competitive BehaviorConflict, PsychologicalCooperative BehaviorGlucocorticoidsNorepinephrineAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansHydrocortisoneMaleSocial BehaviorStress, PsychologicalYohimbineYoung AdultGlucocorticoidsHydrocortisoneNorepinephrineYohimbinecortisolnorepinephrineparochial altruismsocial preferencesstress

Identifiers

PMID40658855
PMCPMC12304886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.