ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Optomechanical reservoir computing.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harvested reservoir computing from road traffic dynamics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonlinear dynamics are pervasive phenomena in natural and synthetic material systems, where time-varying signals from different physical stimuli in the environment influence the material system behavior. Physical reservoir computing leverages these nonlinear dynamics to produce complex input-output mappings by interpreting the dynamical system as a physical recurrent neural network. A source of physical nonlinearity is crucial for enabling the reservoir to predict nonlinear relationships. Despite the significance of nonlinearity, most physical reservoirs leverage only a single source of nonlinearity. Furthermore, there exists a gap between analyses that examine fundamental capabilities of reservoir computers and those that evaluate the practical performance of reservoir computers. In this study, an optomechanical reservoir is introduced that combines both the nonlinear dynamics from bilinear springs and nonlinear sensing from optical fibers. Both the nonlinear springs and the optical fibers are shown to contribute significantly to the range of nonlinear frequency content produced by the optomechanical reservoir. A novelty search of simulated reservoirs highlights the range of performance exhibited by the optomechanical reservoir, and several high performing designs are validated experimentally. Additionally, a frequency content metric is introduced to characterize the nature of a given reservoir's nonlinearity, highlighting what kinds of frequencies the reservoir can and cannot produce. This analysis is an important step toward the rational design of reservoir computers as it allows one to match reservoir computers with computational tasks. The development of both analytical techniques and multiphysics designs lays the groundwork for more effective embodied intelligence in dynamic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.