Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40658849›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Optomechanical reservoir computing.

Steven Kiyabu, Daniel Nelson, John Thomson, Benjamin Schultz, Timothy Vincent, Nathan Hertlein, Andrew Gillman, Amanda Criner, Philip R Buskohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steven KiyabuUES, a BlueHalo Company, Advanced Research and Development Division, Dayton, OH 45432.ORCID 0000-0002-2653-5412
Daniel NelsonUES, a BlueHalo Company, Advanced Research and Development Division, Dayton, OH 45432.
John ThomsonUES, a BlueHalo Company, Advanced Research and Development Division, Dayton, OH 45432.
Benjamin SchultzUES, a BlueHalo Company, Advanced Research and Development Division, Dayton, OH 45432.
Timothy VincentUES, a BlueHalo Company, Advanced Research and Development Division, Dayton, OH 45432.ORCID 0000-0001-9611-953X
Nathan HertleinMaterials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433.ORCID 0009-0005-1503-2448
Andrew GillmanMaterials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433.ORCID 0000-0001-8435-9050
Amanda CrinerMaterials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433.
Philip R BuskohlMaterials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433.ORCID 0000-0001-5517-1956

Funding

DOD | AF | AMC | AFRL | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) 21RXCOR046DOD | AF | AMC | AFRL | Materials and Manufacturing Directorate (AFRL/RX) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonlinear dynamics are pervasive phenomena in natural and synthetic material systems, where time-varying signals from different physical stimuli in the environment influence the material system behavior. Physical reservoir computing leverages these nonlinear dynamics to produce complex input-output mappings by interpreting the dynamical system as a physical recurrent neural network. A source of physical nonlinearity is crucial for enabling the reservoir to predict nonlinear relationships. Despite the significance of nonlinearity, most physical reservoirs leverage only a single source of nonlinearity. Furthermore, there exists a gap between analyses that examine fundamental capabilities of reservoir computers and those that evaluate the practical performance of reservoir computers. In this study, an optomechanical reservoir is introduced that combines both the nonlinear dynamics from bilinear springs and nonlinear sensing from optical fibers. Both the nonlinear springs and the optical fibers are shown to contribute significantly to the range of nonlinear frequency content produced by the optomechanical reservoir. A novelty search of simulated reservoirs highlights the range of performance exhibited by the optomechanical reservoir, and several high performing designs are validated experimentally. Additionally, a frequency content metric is introduced to characterize the nature of a given reservoir's nonlinearity, highlighting what kinds of frequencies the reservoir can and cannot produce. This analysis is an important step toward the rational design of reservoir computers as it allows one to match reservoir computers with computational tasks. The development of both analytical techniques and multiphysics designs lays the groundwork for more effective embodied intelligence in dynamic systems.

Indexed as

analog computingembodied intelligencephysical computationreservoir computingspectral analysis

Identifiers

PMID40658849
PMCPMC12305078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.