ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Different folding mechanisms in prion proteins from mammals with different disease susceptibility observed at the single-molecule level.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Misfolding of the protein PrP causes prion diseases in mammals. Disease susceptibility varies widely among species, despite PrP sequences differing by only a few amino acids. How these differences alter PrP folding and misfolding remains unclear. We compared the folding dynamics of single PrP molecules from three species with different disease susceptibility: dogs (immune), hamsters (susceptible), and bank voles (extremely susceptible). Measurements with optical tweezers revealed important differences between the folding cooperativity, pathways, energy barriers, and kinetics of these proteins. In contrast to the two-state folding of hamster PrP, dog PrP always folded through multiple intermediates. However, both featured rapid native folding, homogeneous energy barriers, and no readily observable misfolding. Bank vole PrP also folded via intermediates, but more slowly and via inhomogeneous barriers. Most notably, it formed several metastable misfolded states starting from the unfolded state. Analyzing the sequence of intermediates seen in pulling curves, we found significant differences in the folding pathways for dog and bank vole PrP, implying that sequence mutations altered energy barriers so as to redirect folding pathways. These results show that subtle differences in PrP sequence between species produce profound changes in folding behavior, providing insight into the factors underlying misfolding propensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.