ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Amplification through local critical behavior in the mammalian cochlea.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Time-Domain Model for the Generation of Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in Resonant Cavities.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Electrical Control of the Transduction Channels' Gating Force in Mechanosensory Hair Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Efferent control of hair cells mechanically coupled by artificial membranes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Amplification through local critical behavior in the mammalian cochlea.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hearing hinges upon the ear's ability to enhance its responsiveness by means of an energy-expending active process that amplifies the very mechanical inputs that it detects. This process is defined by four properties that, although seemingly unrelated, consistently occur together: amplification, sharp frequency tuning, compressive nonlinearity, and spontaneous otoacoustic emission. In nonmammal tetrapods, the active process is evident in individual hair cells. The hair bundles of the bullfrog, for example, exhibit all four attributes by operating near a Hopf bifurcation-a critical regime in which these properties naturally coalesce. In mammals, however, the delicate nature of the cochlea has restricted the evidence for an active process to studies in vivo, where it is generally attributed to the collective effort of the outer hair cells that energize the traveling wave along the cochlear spiral. As a result, the cellular mechanisms that underlie the properties of mammalian hearing remain contested, with uncertainty about whether criticality plays a role in the cochlea's active process. Here we show that, when placed in a recording chamber that closely mimics the in vivo physiological environment, a segment of the mammalian cochlea ex vivo displays the features of the active process-amplification, frequency tuning, compressive nonlinearity, and the generation of distortion products. We show that this process operates locally, independently of traveling waves, and that the sensory epithelium achieves active amplification by operating near criticality at a Hopf bifurcation. The results reveal the existence of a unified biophysical principle that underlies auditory processing across species and even phyla.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.