ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2025
Quality of life in patients with heart failure and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: results from 9274 patients in 42 outpatient heart failure clinics in the National Norwegian Heart Failure Registry.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPatients with heart failure (HF) have increased risk of sudden cardiac death, and treatment with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has become standard treatment for selected patient groups. HF is associated with impaired quality of life (QoL), but studies on QoL in patients with HF and ICD attending follow-up in outpatient HF clinics is sparse. Hence, this study aimed to determine QoL over time in patients with HF with and without ICD using data from the first visit (baseline) and follow-up visit in 42 outpatient HF clinics. METHODS AND
resultsLongitudinal real-world data from the National Norwegian Heart Failure Registry including 9274 patients, of which 1206 with ICD, were studied. QoL was assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Patients with ICD were younger, more often men, and had a higher frequency of coronary artery disease (all P < 0.001). At the first visit, no significant difference in QoL was found between patients with HF with and without ICD, and both groups had significant improvement in QoL from the first to the follow-up visit (P < 0.001). However, patients with HF and ICD reported significantly less improvement (P < 0.001).
conclusionQoL in patients with ICD improves after follow-up in an outpatient HF clinic, although not to the same extent as in patients without ICD. Thus, tailored interventions through a combined HF-ICD care programme are needed to improve QoL in this subgroup of patients with both HF and ICD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.