ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Claustrophilic oviposition: Oviposition performance depends on container size in a novel forced oviposition method for Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mosquito vector control research relies heavily on the use of live organisms, with wild populations playing a critical role in surveillance, field product validation, and strengthening the overall efficacy and accuracy of studies. However, too often wild mosquito rearing and colony establishment in laboratory settings is consistently challenging. Here we present a modified version of a forced oviposition method for use against two different mosquito species, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. The efficacy of the technique was tested with both laboratory and wild-caught strains placed in oviposition tubes consisting of a 1.5 mL tube containing moistened cotton and a strip of germination paper. To determine if size had an impact on oviposition rate, an additional test was conducted using four different size oviposition tubes; 1.5, 5, 15, and 50 mL. Overall, the forced oviposition method was highly effective, successfully generating eggs from lab reared and field collected strains. The method was more effective with Ae. aegypti (>80% females oviposited) compared to Cx. quinquefasciatus (50-60%) in both strains. Culex quinquefasciatus holding time was longer (3-7 days) compared to Ae. aegypti females, which oviposited within 24 hrs of being transferred into tubes. Intact versus broken egg rafts affected egg hatch rate in laboratory Cx. quinquefasciatus strains but had less impact on the wild strain. Additionally, both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus displayed a claustrophilic oviposition behavior with a higher percentage of females ovipositing in the 1.5 and 5 mL tubes. This study demonstrates that the forced oviposition method can be easily adapted to other mosquito vector species and effective in producing F1 progeny needed for critical vector research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.