Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40658737›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

A major trade-off between growth and defense in Arabidopsis thaliana can vanish in field conditions.

Derek S Lundberg, Sonja Kersten, Ezgi Mehmetoğlu Boz, Pratchaya Pramoj Na Ayutthaya, Wangsheng Zhu, Karin Poersch, Wei Yuan, Sophia Swartz, David Müller, Ilja Bezrukov and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Derek S LundbergDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7970-1595
Sonja KerstenDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ezgi Mehmetoğlu BozDepartment of Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pratchaya Pramoj Na AyutthayaDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Wangsheng ZhuDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Karin PoerschDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Wei YuanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sophia SwartzDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
David MüllerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ilja BezrukovDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
HARVEST TEAM
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When wild plants defend themselves from pathogens, this often comes with a trade-off: the same genes that protect a plant from disease can also reduce its growth and fecundity in the absence of pathogens. One protein implicated in a major growth-defense trade-off is ACCELERATED CELL DEATH 6 (ACD6), an ion channel that modulates salicylic acid (SA) synthesis to potentiate a wide range of defenses. Wild Arabidopsis thaliana populations maintain significant functional variation at the ACD6 locus, with some alleles making the protein hyperactive. In the greenhouse, plants with hyperactive ACD6 alleles are resistant to diverse pathogens, yet they are of smaller stature, their leaves senesce earlier, and they set fewer seeds compared to plants with the standard allele. We hypothesized that ACD6 hyperactivity would not only affect the growth of microbial pathogens but also more generally change leaf microbiome assembly. To test this in an ecologically meaningful context, we compared plants with hyperactive, standard, and defective ACD6 alleles in the same field-collected soil, both outdoors and in naturally lit and climate-controlled indoor conditions, taking advantage of near-isogenic lines as well as a natural accession and a CRISPR-edited derivative. We surveyed visual phenotypes, gene expression, hormone levels, seed production, and the microbiome in each environment. The genetic precision of CRISPR-edited plants allowed us to conclude that ACD6 genotype had no effect on mature field plants in our setting, despite reproducibly dramatic effects on greenhouse plants. We conclude that additional abiotic and/or microbial signals present outdoors-but not in the greenhouse-greatly modulate ACD6 activity. This raises the possibility that the fitness costs of other commonly studied immune system genes may be grossly misjudged without field studies.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsAllelesDisease ResistanceGene Expression Regulation, PlantMicrobiotaPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesSalicylic AcidArabidopsis ProteinsSalicylic Acid

Identifiers

PMID40658737
PMCPMC12273917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.