ArticlePloS one2025
Correlation between pre-extraction periodontal diagnosis and peri-implant microbiome for patients treated with implant-retained overdenture - A retrospective cohort pilot study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited clinical data exists on the peri-implant microbiome in edentulous patients with implant-retained overdentures (IRO). This study aimed to examine the peri-implant microbiome and its correlation with pre-treatment periodontal diagnosis. A total of twenty-five patients with 50 implants were included, with demographic information and pre-treatment periodontal diagnosis collected. Clinical measurements and subgingival plaque samples were obtained from each implant, followed by 16S rRNA gene-targeted sequencing. Peri-implant parameters and microbiome were analyzed in relation to gender, remaining teeth prior to treatment, IRO function time, implant system, bone graft at implant placement, and peri-implant diagnosis. The mean age of patients was 71 years, with pre-extraction diagnoses including clinical healthy gingiva on a reduced periodontium (4 patients), localized periodontitis (4 patients), generalized periodontitis (7 patients), and generalized Stage IV Grade C periodontitis (10 patients). Nineteen implants were diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis, while 31 were healthy. The predominant genera detected were Streptococcus, Rothia, Veillonella, Actinomyces, and Schaalia. No significant correlation was found between pre-treatment periodontal diagnosis and peri-implant diagnosis. The findings suggest that while pre-extraction periodontal diagnosis might influence the peri-implant subgingival microbiome in IRO patients, it may not correlate with the clinical peri-implant diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.