ArticlePloS one2025
Relative age effect, morphological status and physical performance of U-15 Croatian football players.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relative Age Effect in Olympic Karate: Evidence from Tokyo 2020.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Relative age selection bias does not translate into a playing-time advantage: evidence from Italian Serie A football.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relative age effect (RAE) refers to the unequal quartal-to-quartal birth distribution in competitive sports, leading to more athletes being born earlier in the selection period. This effect results in relatively older players, who are often physically more developed, being overrepresented in youth academies and professional levels, as they receive more attention and opportunities due to their advanced biological maturation and superior physical performance compared to their younger peers. This study involved 177 U-15 football players from Dalmatia, Croatia, averaging 14.1 ± 0.9 yrs of age and 6.6 ± 1.9 yrs of training experience. Anthropometric characteristics, motor-functional abilities, and specific abilities with the ball were measured over two days, using standardised equipment and procedures, and the data were analysed with descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and post hoc least significant difference tests to identify differences across quartiles. The study found statistically significant differences in the distribution and characteristics of players born in different quartiles of the year, with 63.3% born in the first two quartiles. RAE influenced young football players' birth distribution and physical characteristics, with a higher proportion born in the first quartile of the year (Q1) and showing superior morphological development and physical performance. Q1 players were significantly taller and heavier and performed better in explosiveness tests (medium effect sizes) compared to other quartiles. Furthermore, small to medium effect differences occurred in circumferences, 20-m, 30-m sprints and ball-kicking velocities in favour of Q1. As these abilities and characteristics are key to success in football, players born in the first quartile have an advantage in the selection process. This highlights the need for coaches to focus on potential talent rather than current performance despite the competitive pressure to win.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.