ArticlePLoS biology2025
Sensory and motor contents are prioritized dynamically in working memory.
Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Changes of Attentional Priorities in Visual Search: Tracking Covert Switches of Preparatory Attentional Templates in Real Time.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Sensory and motor contents are prioritized dynamically in working memory.PLoS biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Internal selective attention prioritizes both sensory and motor contents in working memory to guide prospective behavior. Prior research has shown how attention modulation of sensory contents is flexible and temporally tuned depending on access requirements, but whether the prioritization of motor contents follows similar flexible dynamics remains elusive. Also uncharted is the degree of co-dependence of sensory and motor modulation, which gets at the nature of both working-memory representations and internal attention functions. To address these questions, we independently tracked the prioritization of sensory and motor working-memory contents as a function of dynamically evolving temporal expectations in human participants. The design orthogonally manipulated when an item location (left versus right side) and associated prospective action (left versus right hand) would be relevant. Contralateral-vs-ipsilateral modulation of posterior alpha (8-12 Hz) activity in electroencephalography (EEG) tracked prioritization of the item location, while contralateral-vs-ipsilateral modulation of central mu/beta (8-30 Hz) activity tracked response prioritization. Proactive and dynamic alpha and mu/beta modulation confirmed the flexible and temporally structured prioritization of sensory and motor contents alike. Intriguingly, the prioritization of sensory and motor contents was temporally uncoupled, showing dissociable patterns of modulation. The findings reveal multiple modulatory functions of internal attention operating in tandem to prepare relevant aspects of internal representations for adaptive behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.