ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2025
Compression-tension cell with sample manipulator for in situ X-ray nanotomography experiments.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In situ X-ray nanotomography experiments where tensile or compressive force is applied on the sample require specialized equipment. A compression-tension device with fluid flow-through capability has been designed for X-ray nanotomography beamlines. The compression-tension cell is equipped with a triaxial stage for sample alignment and a high sensitivity loadcell for measurement of applied force. To handle the <100 µm samples used for X-ray nanotomography imaging and for loading samples on the compression-tension cell a sample manipulator has been built. The sample manipulator is capable of selecting a single <100 µm particle for nanotomography scanning while viewing multiple samples under an optical microscope. To test the functionality of these two devices an initial compression experiment involving two glass beads was performed. To demonstrate instrument stability two spherical glass beads were compressed from a no load condition until one of the beads fractured. Nanotomography data were collected at each step of increasing compressive force. The experimentally observed contact area of the spherical glass beads was compared with the theoretical estimate using the Hertz analysis. To demonstrate the fluid flow capability, two calcite grains were compressed against each other under a calcite saturated solution. Surface topological changes were observed for the stressed grain contact area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.