Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40658529›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2025

Corticospinal excitability during timed interception depends on the speed of the moving target.

Justin R McCurdy, Daniel Zlatopolsky, Ria Doshi, Jing Xu, Deborah A Barany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predictive interception across speed profiles.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin R McCurdyDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States.
Daniel ZlatopolskyDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-0469-3863
Ria DoshiDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States.
Jing XuDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0388-5046
Deborah A BaranyDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1619-1513

Funding

Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BOGER, HEATHER A · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successfully intercepting a moving object requires precisely timing the optimal moment to act by integrating information about the target's visual motion properties. Neurophysiological evidence indicates that activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) during interception preparation is sensitive to both the target's kinematic features and motor planning. However, how visual motion signals modulate M1 during timed interception remains unclear. In the present study, we applied single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1 to examine how a target's kinematics influence corticospinal excitability during interception preparation. Participants were instructed to abduct their right index finger to intercept a target moving horizontally at a constant speed toward a fixed interception zone. Target speed (Fast or Slow) and travel distance (Far or Close) were manipulated while controlling motion duration across conditions. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited at five latencies before target arrival at the interception zone. Consistent with previous behavioral findings, movement initiation occurred earlier for faster targets and was delayed when TMS was applied closer to the target's arrival. Though MEPs were generally suppressed relative to baseline at earlier time points and facilitated closer to movement initiation, we observed that target speed-but not distance-influenced the time course of MEP modulation. When adjusting for movement initiation times, there was an overall reduced suppression and increased facilitation for faster-moving targets, possibly reflecting a heightened urgency to move. These results suggest M1 activity during interception preparation reflects internal estimates of target motion, which may serve to optimize interception timing and performance.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMotion PerceptionMotor CortexPsychomotor PerformancePyramidal TractsAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultaction preparationinterceptionprimary motor cortextarget speedtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40658529
PMCPMC12706745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.