ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2025
Corticospinal excitability during timed interception depends on the speed of the moving target.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated approaches for investigating the neural bases of movement-highlights from the 34th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neural Control of Movement.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Motor Intention Drives Corticospinal Facilitation during Interception Planning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predictive interception across speed profiles.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Successfully intercepting a moving object requires precisely timing the optimal moment to act by integrating information about the target's visual motion properties. Neurophysiological evidence indicates that activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) during interception preparation is sensitive to both the target's kinematic features and motor planning. However, how visual motion signals modulate M1 during timed interception remains unclear. In the present study, we applied single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1 to examine how a target's kinematics influence corticospinal excitability during interception preparation. Participants were instructed to abduct their right index finger to intercept a target moving horizontally at a constant speed toward a fixed interception zone. Target speed (Fast or Slow) and travel distance (Far or Close) were manipulated while controlling motion duration across conditions. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited at five latencies before target arrival at the interception zone. Consistent with previous behavioral findings, movement initiation occurred earlier for faster targets and was delayed when TMS was applied closer to the target's arrival. Though MEPs were generally suppressed relative to baseline at earlier time points and facilitated closer to movement initiation, we observed that target speed-but not distance-influenced the time course of MEP modulation. When adjusting for movement initiation times, there was an overall reduced suppression and increased facilitation for faster-moving targets, possibly reflecting a heightened urgency to move. These results suggest M1 activity during interception preparation reflects internal estimates of target motion, which may serve to optimize interception timing and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.