ArticleJAMA network open2025
Delayed Hypertension Diagnosis and Its Association With Cardiovascular Treatment and Outcomes.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hidden morbidity in early adulthood: Discrepancies between self-reported and screening-detected health conditions among university students in Ghana.Global epidemiology · 2026Article
- Rising Hypertension Mortality Rates Are Independent of Coding Drift.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Article
- Design considerations for hypertension chronotherapy trials: insights from experience and modelling.BMC medicine · 2026Review
- Trends of new diagnosis and treatment initiation of hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Powered Wearable and Portable Devices for Remote Cardiac Care and Population Health.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Equity in the continuum of hypertension care: evidence from a nationally representative survey in Nepal.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Comment on "Burden of hypertension-related diseases in Eastern Mediterranean region".Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Ethnic differences in the burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors among adult residents of London: the TOGETHER study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Sex stratified analysis of patients with resistant hypertension from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry of renal denervation.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Why Can't We Get There?: Understanding Persistent Hypertension in Real-World Care.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet delays in diagnosis may limit timely treatment initiation and increase cardiovascular risk. Objectives: To examine the timing of clinical hypertension diagnosis, its association with antihypertensive medication prescribing, and its association with long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from an integrated health care system. Adults aged 18 to 85 years with at least 2 outpatient blood pressure (BP) readings of 140/90 mm Hg or more recorded at least 30 days apart from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021, were included (meeting BP-based criteria for hypertension as recorded in the EHR; ie, a "computed hypertension diagnosis"). Data were analyzed from January to November 2023. Exposures: The timing of clinical hypertension diagnosis (the formal recorded diagnosis by a clinician) relative to the second elevated BP measurement was categorized as (1) preexisting diagnosis; (2) diagnosed between the first and second BP elevations (reference group); (3) diagnosed after the second BP elevation, subdivided into 1 to 90 days, 91 to 365 days, or more than 365 days after the second BP elevation; and (4) no recorded diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was antihypertensive medication prescription within 30 days of diagnosis. The secondary outcome was the 5-year composite risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or heart failure hospitalization. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular outcomes, adjusting for demographics, BP, and comorbidities. Results: Among 311 743 patients with a computed hypertension diagnosis, 14.6% received a diagnosis after the second BP elevation (mean [SD] age 57.9 [13.1] years; 53.3% women; 69.6% non-Hispanic White, 24.9% non-Hispanic Black, 2.4% Hispanic or Latino, and 1.7% non-Hispanic Asian). Delayed diagnosis was associated with lower antihypertensive medication prescription rates (30.6% vs 75.2%; P < .001) and increased cardiovascular risk over 5 years (delay of 1-90 days: HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.95-1.13]; delay of 91-365 days: HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04-1.19]; and delay of >365 days: HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.23-1.36]). Greater delay in clinical diagnosis of hypertension was associated with younger age (45-64 years: median delay, 17.5 months [IQR, 6.1-34.6 months] vs ≥75 years: median delay, 13.4 months [IQR, 4.7-28.2 months]; P < .001), female sex (median delay, 16.6 months [IQR, 5.8-33.7 months] vs male sex: median delay, 16.1 months [IQR, 5.7-33.1 months]; P < .001), and non-Hispanic Asian or non-Hispanic Black race (non-Hispanic Asian: median delay, 18.5 months [IQR, 6.9-34.0 months]; non-Hispanic Black: median delay, 17.2 months [IQR, 5.8-34.9 months]; vs non-Hispanic White: median delay, 16.3 months [IQR, 5.9-33.3 months]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that delays in hypertension diagnosis were common and significantly associated with delays in treatment initiation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, underscoring the need for earlier identification and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.