Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40658418›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Delayed Hypertension Diagnosis and Its Association With Cardiovascular Treatment and Outcomes.

Yuan Lu, John E Brush, Chungsoo Kim, Yuntian Liu, Xin Xin, Chenxi Huang, Mitsuaki Sawano, Patrick Young, Jacob McPadden, Mark Anderson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Trends of new diagnosis and treatment initiation of hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex stratified analysis of patients with resistant hypertension from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry of renal denervation.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuan LuCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
John E BrushSentara Health Research Center, Sentara Health, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Chungsoo KimCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Yuntian LiuCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Xin XinCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Chenxi HuangCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Mitsuaki SawanoCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Patrick YoungSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jacob McPaddenYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Mark AndersonSentara Health Research Center, Sentara Health, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
John S BurrowsSentara Health Research Center, Sentara Health, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Jordan R AsherSentara Health Research Center, Sentara Health, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Harlan M KrumholzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Real-world Evidence to Inform Decisions for Hypertension Treatment EscalationR01HL169954 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Yuan Lu · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL169954NHLBI NIH HHS RO1 HL069954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet delays in diagnosis may limit timely treatment initiation and increase cardiovascular risk. Objectives: To examine the timing of clinical hypertension diagnosis, its association with antihypertensive medication prescribing, and its association with long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from an integrated health care system. Adults aged 18 to 85 years with at least 2 outpatient blood pressure (BP) readings of 140/90 mm Hg or more recorded at least 30 days apart from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021, were included (meeting BP-based criteria for hypertension as recorded in the EHR; ie, a "computed hypertension diagnosis"). Data were analyzed from January to November 2023. Exposures: The timing of clinical hypertension diagnosis (the formal recorded diagnosis by a clinician) relative to the second elevated BP measurement was categorized as (1) preexisting diagnosis; (2) diagnosed between the first and second BP elevations (reference group); (3) diagnosed after the second BP elevation, subdivided into 1 to 90 days, 91 to 365 days, or more than 365 days after the second BP elevation; and (4) no recorded diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was antihypertensive medication prescription within 30 days of diagnosis. The secondary outcome was the 5-year composite risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or heart failure hospitalization. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular outcomes, adjusting for demographics, BP, and comorbidities. Results: Among 311 743 patients with a computed hypertension diagnosis, 14.6% received a diagnosis after the second BP elevation (mean [SD] age 57.9 [13.1] years; 53.3% women; 69.6% non-Hispanic White, 24.9% non-Hispanic Black, 2.4% Hispanic or Latino, and 1.7% non-Hispanic Asian). Delayed diagnosis was associated with lower antihypertensive medication prescription rates (30.6% vs 75.2%; P < .001) and increased cardiovascular risk over 5 years (delay of 1-90 days: HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.95-1.13]; delay of 91-365 days: HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04-1.19]; and delay of >365 days: HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.23-1.36]). Greater delay in clinical diagnosis of hypertension was associated with younger age (45-64 years: median delay, 17.5 months [IQR, 6.1-34.6 months] vs ≥75 years: median delay, 13.4 months [IQR, 4.7-28.2 months]; P < .001), female sex (median delay, 16.6 months [IQR, 5.8-33.7 months] vs male sex: median delay, 16.1 months [IQR, 5.7-33.1 months]; P < .001), and non-Hispanic Asian or non-Hispanic Black race (non-Hispanic Asian: median delay, 18.5 months [IQR, 6.9-34.0 months]; non-Hispanic Black: median delay, 17.2 months [IQR, 5.8-34.9 months]; vs non-Hispanic White: median delay, 16.3 months [IQR, 5.9-33.3 months]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that delays in hypertension diagnosis were common and significantly associated with delays in treatment initiation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, underscoring the need for earlier identification and intervention.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesDelayed DiagnosisHypertensionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID40658418
PMCPMC12261005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.