Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40658392›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2025

Clinical Decision Support System for Primary Care of Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rebecca C Rossom, A Lauren Crain, Eric A Wright, Anthony W Olson, Irina Haller, Jacob Haapala, Steven P Dehmer, Stephanie A Hooker, Leif Solberg, Patrick J O'Connor and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04198428 (Clinic-Randomized Trial of Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorders in Medical Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04198428 nacompletednot on this map

Clinic-Randomized Trial of Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorders in Medical Settings (COMPUTE 2.0)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealthPartners InstituteRan2019 to 2023Enrolled10,891ConditionsOpioid-use DisorderArmsOpioid Wizard
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comorbidities of substance use: Opportunities realized and future needs.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Rebecca C RossomHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
A Lauren CrainHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Eric A WrightGeisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Anthony W OlsonEssentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota.
Irina HallerEssentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota.
Jacob HaapalaHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Steven P DehmerHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Stephanie A HookerHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Leif SolbergHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Patrick J O'ConnorHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Caitlin Borgert-SpaniolHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jule GorodisherHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kathleen MileyHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Katrina RomagnoliGeisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Clayton AllenEssentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota.
Lorraine TusingGeisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Heidi EkstromHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Deepika AppanaHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
JoAnn M Sperl-HillenHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Maria KobylinskiGeisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Kristen HuntleyNational Institute on Drug Abuse, Center for the Clinical Trials Network, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Jennifer McCormackThe Emmes Company, Rockville, Maryland.
Wei ChenThe Emmes Company, Rockville, Maryland.
Gavin BartHennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

Suicide Prediction and Prevention for People at Risk for Opioid Use DisorderUG1DA040316 · NIDA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GAVIN BART · 2015 to 2026
$42.2M
NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA040316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Nearly 727 000 individuals in the US died of opioid overdoses between 1999 and 2022. The current workforce of addiction medicine specialists is inadequate to address the scale of this crisis, and primary care clinicians (PCCs) do not feel sufficiently supported to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Objective: To evaluate whether an electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support system (CDSS) increases OUD diagnosis and treatment in primary care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2021 to December 2023. Primary care clinics in 3 health systems in 4 US states were randomized to receive or not receive an electronic health record-integrated CDSS aimed at improving OUD diagnosis and treatment. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years, visited a randomized clinic, and had an OUD diagnosis in the last 2 years, opioid overdose in the last 6 months, or risk score indicating high risk of OUD or opioid overdose. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to October 2024. Interventions: The OUD CDSS provided personalized treatment recommendations to patients and PCCs in intervention clinics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were likelihood to receive (1) an OUD diagnosis (among high-risk patients without a baseline OUD diagnosis), (2) a naloxone prescription, or (3) a prescription of a medication for OUD (MOUD) or specialty referral, all within 30 days of first eligible (index) visit, and (4) days covered by a MOUD prescription in the 90 days after index. Results: Among 10 891 patients meeting eligibility criteria, 5918 (54.3%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 48.0 (13.9) years. There was no difference in OUD diagnoses within 30 days between groups. Patients in the intervention group had more naloxone orders (80 of 5538 [1.4%] vs 40 of 5353 [0.7%]; odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.14-2.72) and orders for MOUDs or treatment referral (775 of 5538 [14.0%] vs 503 of 5353 [9.4%]; odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05-2.08) within 30 days. There were no differences in median (IQR) days covered by MOUD over 90 days postindex between intervention (84 [55-90] days) and usual care (83 [55-90] days; rate ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08) or in overdose or death rates during the intervention period. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial, the intervention improved rates of naloxone orders and OUD treatment in primary care but did not affect days covered by a MOUD over 90 days postindex or overdose or death rates. These findings demonstrate an OUD CDSS can help increase access to OUD treatment in primary care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04198428.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalOpioid-Related DisordersPrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate OverdoseUnited StatesYoung AdultNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID40658392
PMCPMC12261115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.