ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Ascertainment Conditional Maximum Likelihood for Continuous Outcome Under Two-Phase Response-Selective Design.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ascertainment Conditional Maximum Likelihood for Continuous Outcome Under Two-Phase Response-Selective Design.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data collection procedures are often time-consuming and expensive. An alternative to collecting full information from all subjects enrolled in a study is a two-phase design: Variables that are inexpensive or easy to measure are obtained for the study population, and more specific, expensive, or hard-to-measure variables are collected only for a well-selected sample of individuals. Often, only these subjects that provided full information are used for inference, while those that were partially observed are discarded from the analysis. Recently, semiparametric approaches that use the entire dataset, resulting in fully efficient estimators, have been proposed. These estimators, however, have challenges incorporating multiple covariates, are computationally expensive, and depend on tuning parameters that affect their performance. In this paper, we propose an alternative semiparametric estimator that does not pose any distributional assumptions on the covariates or measurement error mechanism and can be applied to a wider range of settings. Although the proposed estimator is not semiparametric efficient, simulations show that the loss of efficiency to estimate the parameters associated with the partially observed covariates is minimal. We highlight the estimator's applicability to real-world problems, where data structures are complex and rich, and complicated regression models are often necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.