ArticleBotanical studies2025
Identification of candidate genes for Nilaparvata lugens (stål) resistance through genomic dissection from diverse Indigenous rice genotypes.
Article in Botanical studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRice production faces relentless threat from the brown plant hopper (Nilaparvata lugens), particularly in Asian subcontinents like India, where the highly damaging biotype-4 is prevalent. Developing rice varieties with long-lasting resistance is crucial to combat this threat sustainably. This study aimed to identify stable novel resistant sources and associate molecular markers with resistant loci present in the new sources of resistance. In this study, 152 rice genotypes were screened against N. lugens, and further genotyping was done using 82 SSR (Simple Sequence Repeat) markers linked to 28 N. lugens-resistant genes and QTLs.
resultsAfter continuous screening for three seasons, 33 resistant rice genotypes (score 1) were identified. Unlike susceptible genotypes, resistant genotypes exhibited lower plant damage, nymphal survival, and honeydew excretion, with ranges of 4.60–8.90%, 11.50–24.00%, and 3.43 to 7.43 cm², respectively. However, resistant genotypes showed more feeding marks, ranging from 22.67 to 32.00 plant− 1. Genetic analysis indicated an average genetic diversity of 0.150 and a polymorphic information content of 0.128 for the markers. Cluster and population structure analyses classified the genotypes into three primary genetic groups. This grouping was corroborated by Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA), which separated susceptible, moderately resistant, and resistant genotypes into distinct components. Additionally, 87% of the genetic variation was between individuals of the populations and 13% between populations.
conclusionMarker-trait association analysis using generalized linear models (GLM) and mixed-linear models (MLM) identified two markers viz. RM1313 (Bph9) and RM7 (Qbph3) were significantly associated with phenotypic parameters related to N. lugens resistance. Among these RM7 (Qbph3) was identified by both GLM and MLM analyses. These findings highlight the potential of identified resistant genes in rice landraces for developing durable resistant varieties against N. lugens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.