ReviewClinical oral investigations2025
Facial artery-based flap for oral and maxillofacial defects: a narrative review.
Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Submental island flap reconstruction in the era of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a propensity score-matched cohort study in oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Vein-protection-first strategy revolutionizes submental artery perforator flap harvest success: the A-B-C technique and training assessment.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Recent innovations in nasolabial and facial artery myomucosal flaps: A commentary.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects poses considerable challenges due to their complex nature. Surgeons often face difficulties in selecting the most appropriate flap for such repairs. The procedure involving vascularized free flaps typically requires prolonged procedural times and places significant demands on surgical teams. In specific cases, facial artery-based flaps serve as an effective alternative. This article discusses the current utilization and future prospects of facial artery-based flaps in the reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive review of the literature was undertaken to explore the anatomy of the facial artery and its associated structures, including muscles, glands, and nerves. The review encompasses various facial artery-derived flaps such as the submental island flap (SIF), facial artery flap (FAIF), nasolabial island flap (NAIF), facial artery myomucosal island flap (FAMMIF), and submandibular gland flap (SMGF).
resultThe identified flaps were classified based on the branches of the facial artery, with a concise overview of their preparation methods. This article provides an in-depth discussion of the indications, contraindications, and recent advancements related to facial artery-based flaps.
conclusionFacial artery-based flaps are noted for their ease of elevation and versatility, making them valuable tools for addressing complex maxillofacial defects. Additionally, these flaps can be utilized in combination to form chimeric flaps, thereby expanding their application. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This article presents a diverse range of facial artery-based flaps, offering clinicians an enhanced selection of options for the effective repair of maxillofacial defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40658270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.