ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Pathological omics prediction of early and advanced colon cancer based on artificial intelligence model.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal foundation models in colorectal cancer: from prediction to trustworthy clinical insight.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Uncertainty-aware and causal test-time adaptive foundation model for robust colorectal cancer pathology diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) models based on pathological slides have great potential to assist pathologists in disease diagnosis and have become an important research direction in the field of medical image analysis. The aim of this study was to develop an AI model based on whole-slide images to predict the stage of colon cancer. In this study, a total of 100 pathological slides of colon cancer patients were collected as the training set, and 421 pathological slides of colon cancer were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database as the external validation set. Cellprofiler and CLAM tools were used to extract pathological features, and machine learning algorithms and deep learning algorithms were used to construct prediction models. The area under the curve (AUC) of the best machine learning model was 0.78 in the internal test set and 0.68 in the external test set. The AUC of the deep learning model in the internal test set was 0.889, and the accuracy of the model was 0.854. The AUC of the deep learning model in the external test set was 0.700. The prediction model has the potential to generalize in the process of combining pathological omics diagnosis. Compared with machine learning, deep learning has higher recognition and accuracy of images, and the performance of the model is better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.