ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025
The determinants of fluid accumulation in critically ill children: a prospective single-center cohort study.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fluid Creep as an Independent Predictor of Fluid Overload and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFluid accumulation (FA) is associated with morbidity and mortality in intensive care. We aimed to determine sources of FA in critically ill children admitted to pediatric intensive care.
methodsProspective cohort study of children in a university affiliated tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. Primary outcome was to describe contributors to fluid intake. Secondary outcomes were independent associations between fluid intake and FA > 5%, ventilator-free days, and intensive-care-free days.
resultsOf patients admitted to intensive care, 99/120 (83%) met eligibility criteria. Median total fluid intake was median [interquartile range (IQR)] 46.9 [30.3, 72.1] ml/kg/day, and median [IQR] fluid output was 26.3 [15.1, 49.8] ml/kg/day. The largest contributors to fluid intake were maintenance (37.4%; IQR 20.0, 57.3), nutrition (23.2%; IQR 6.8, 58.1), medications (7.8%; IQR 2.9, 21.8), and resuscitative fluid (4.2%; IQR 0, 18). Children with peak FA > 5% versus FA ≤ 5% had higher total fluid intake (67.8 vs. 30.3 ml/kg/day; odds ratio (OR) 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06, 1.14)] and output [36.9 vs. 19.5 ml/kg/day; OR 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02, 1.06)], and higher volumes of maintenance, nutrition, and medications, but not resuscitative fluid. Total fluid intake was independently associated with FA > 5% (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.05, 1.14; p < 0.001). At 28 days, peak FA% was independently associated with fewer intensive-care-free days [Effect Size - 0.30 (95% CI - 0.45, - 0.16), p < 0.001)].
conclusionsHigher fluid intake, rather than reduced output, was the predominant factor in FA, with maintenance fluid being the largest source of intake. Future research should evaluate the impact of optimized maintenance fluid calculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40658220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.