ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2025
Successful endoscopic removal of an impacted esophageal sponge in an elderly woman with dementia.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute intestinal obstruction due to sponge bezoar in a patient with a history of eating disorders: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Single-session endoscopic removal of a giant gastric diospyrobezoar in a remnant stomach using direct Coca-Cola injection and mechanical fragmentation.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic challenges in surfactant poisoning: A case of dishwashing detergent ingestion in a dementia patient.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An 81-year-old woman residing in a nursing facility due to dementia presented with a 5-day history of vomiting and anorexia. Computed tomography revealed air-containing material in the esophagus, and sponge fragments had been noted in her vomitus 4 days earlier. Accidental sponge ingestion with esophageal impaction was suspected, and emergency endoscopy was performed. The sponge was friable and fragmented easily, making removal difficult. Standard tools including grasping forceps, snares, and nets were ineffective, but a five-pronged grasping forceps enabled successful removal. Follow-up endoscopy revealed an esophageal ulcer presumedly caused by pressure from the sponge, without bleeding or perforation. The ulcer recovered with proton pump inhibitor therapy. Sponge ingestion is a rare cause of esophageal foreign bodies but may become more frequent due to the growing elderly population with cognitive impairment. Sponge is potentially dangerous as it may cause mucosal injury or perforation. However, because they allow fluid passage, symptoms may be mild and diagnosis delayed. Once beyond the duodenum, endoscopic removal becomes extremely difficult. Therefore, sponge foreign bodies should be removed endoscopically when feasible, and simply displacing them to resolve obstruction is not sufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40658175What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.