ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Radiological outcome and complications after subcapital shortening osteotomy for the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis- a case series.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is growing evidence that after moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), in-situ fixation can result in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Several different realignment procedures have been described but their use remains controversial due to high complication rates and technical complexity. Our study aims to evaluate the radiological outcomes and complications of patients who underwent open reduction with subcapital shortening osteotomy for moderate or severe SCFE.
methodsRadiographic and clinical data of patients with SCFE treated with subcapital shortening osteotomy performed by a single surgeon between October 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analysed. We collected patient demographics, pre- and post-operative radiographic measurements (Southwick slip angle, alpha angle and articulo-trochanteric distance (ADT), and post-operative complications. Patient outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics.
resultsEighteen children and adolescents were reviewed, four were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. At the last follow-up, the lateral Southwick slip angle was corrected to a mean of 11 ° (1-31°). The mean alpha angle, measured at the final follow-up, was 59 ° (42-88°). One patient showed signs of radiological coxa breva. There were two patients with severe radiological cam deformities and one case of avascular necrosis (AVN).
conclusionOur findings suggest that the subcapital shortening osteotomy is an effective method for restoring head-neck anatomy in patients with moderate to severe SCFE, with good radiological outcomes. Our low incidence of avascular necrosis further supports the safety of this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40658155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.