ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Dual- energy CT versus single-energy CT for estimation of hematocrit and hemoglobin in the brain: an in vivo analysis.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHematocrit (Hct) and hemoglobin (HB) levels in blood are known to be correlated with vascular attenuation values on single-energy computed tomography (SECT). Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is likely to have even better correlations than SECT, given its richer information content, but this remains unproven clinically. We compare and contrast DECT and SECT correlations between attenuation in the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) to patient Hct/HB levels, and explore the use of iodine/water decomposition maps for the same purpose.
methodsBrain SECT and DECT were acquired contemporaneously in 83 patients and attenuation was measured in the SSS on SECT, monoenergetic DECT images (40 to 140 keV in 5 keV increments) and DECT material decomposition images (water and iodine). Hct/HB values were from complete blood counts (CBC) within 30 days of imaging. Linear regressions were performed to Hct/HB using the measured attenuations as explanatory variables.
resultsHct and HB were strongly mutually correlated (r = 0.964). Hct/HB were moderately correlated (r = 0.493/0.458) with SSS attenuation on SECT, and moderately to strongly correlated for DECT (Pearson's r ranging 0.331-0.656) over a range of monoenergetic levels (40 to 140 keV). Above 60 keV, DECT monoenergetic images were better correlated to Hct/HB than SECT, with correlation maximized at 95 keV (r = 0.656, p < 0.001). Material decomposition water images had moderate correlation (r = 0.51), improving to strong correlation (r = 0.659) for a two-variable water and iodine regression, similar to the monoenergetic results.
conclusionDECT has better correlations to Hct/HB than SECT for all monoenergetic energies above 60 keV, with best correlations at 95 keV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40658143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.