ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Dichoptic Visual Search at Varied Fellow Eye Contrasts and Visual Function Deficits in Amblyopia.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Look Versus See": Does Varying Fellow Eye Contrast Affect Perception of the Amblyopic Eye?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This study uses dichoptic visual search and psychophysical visual function data to understand factors that impact amblyopic eyes' ability to perceive the stimulus while the fellow eye (FE) contrast is reduced under dichoptic viewing in children and adults. Methods: Twenty-three amblyopic (anisometropic = 11, strabismic/mixed = 11) and 14 control participants performed visual search and spot-the-difference tasks during monocular and dichoptic viewing with amblyopic eye (AE) contrast held constant at 100% while FE contrasts varied at 100%,50%,25% and 10%. Accuracies and reaction times were analyzed and correlated with visual acuity deficit of amblyopic eye, stereoacuity and suppression. Results: Amblyopic participants showed reduced accuracies and longer reaction times in visual search and spot-the-difference tasks. Reducing the FE contrast improved their ability to identify the targets and differences with greater improvement observed for anisometropic than strabismic subjects. However, participants with higher suppression, visual acuity deficits in the AE, and stereoacuity deficits faced greater difficulties, with reduced accuracies and reaction time, especially at high FE contrasts. For tasks requiring comparison between AE and FE regions to spot-the-differences, deficits in AE visual acuity, suppression and stereoacuity were linked to reduced accuracy and increased reaction times, even at 10% FE contrasts. Conclusions: The study highlights the challenges amblyopic participants face in dichoptic tasks, particularly at high FE contrasts. Dichoptic contrast modulation holds promise in enhancing the perception of the AE with responses varying by visual function deficits. It also highlights that quantification of perception of the AE in dichoptic environment with tools such as visual search may allow tailoring of passive video-based dichoptic therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.