Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657824›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2025

Fertility-Related Concerns in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Pauline Holmer, Martina Ospelt, Gisela Michel, Vicky Lehmann, Fiona S M Schulte

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pauline HolmerFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-5207
Martina OspeltFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3681-8671
Gisela MichelFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-0928
Vicky LehmannDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4898-3176
Fiona S M SchulteDepartment of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-9676

Funding

Mobility Grant, University of Lucerne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChildhood cancer survivors are at increased risk for treatment-related fertility impairment and subsequent fertility-related concerns. However, there is currently no consensus on how to define, assess, and address these concerns in clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to answer the following questions: (1) How are fertility-related concerns assessed and defined? (2) What types of fertility-related concerns are reported by survivors, and how common are they? (3) What clinical implications are proposed in the literature?

methodsWe systematically searched the databases PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase for peer-reviewed publications on fertility-related concerns in survivors of childhood cancer published between January 1990 and November 2023. The search yielded 2077 potentially relevant articles, of which eleven met inclusion criteria and were included. Furthermore, we screened the reference lists of included studies, leading to a total of N = 25 studies included in the narrative synthesis.

resultsWe identified considerable variation in the assessment, description, and definition of fertility-related concerns. Survivors described fertility-related concerns in terms of their personal and reproductive health, the health of their (future) children, and dating and romantic relationships. Concerns were reported by 9.5% to 65% of survivors in quantitative studies. Suggestions for clinical implications included that different healthcare providers could use individual or group strategies to address fertility-related concerns. They should focus on patient reports rather than parent-proxy reports and assess individual fertility-related preferences and attitudes without making assumptions.

conclusionsFertility-related concerns are common among childhood cancer survivors and need to be addressed by care providers and researchers in the field. To do so effectively, we need more consistency in assessing, labeling, and defining these concerns.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFertilityNeoplasmsChildFemaleFertility PreservationHumansMalecancercancer survivorschildhood cancerconcernsfertilityoncologyreproduction

Identifiers

PMID40657824
PMCPMC12257495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.