Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657730›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2025

Process for Rapid Co-development of a Decision Aid Prototype for Population-wide Cancer Screening.

Odilon Quentin Assan, Claude Bernard Uwizeye, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Oscar Nduwimana, Wilhelm Dubuisson, Guillaume Sillon, Danielle Bergeron, Stéphane Groulx, Wilber Deck, Anik Giguère and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Odilon Quentin AssanUnité de soutien SSA Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-7907
Claude Bernard UwizeyeUnité de soutien SSA Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-6567
Hervé Tchala Vignon ZomahounInstitut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux, Quebec, Canada.
Oscar NduwimanaUnité de soutien SSA Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-8260-6930
Wilhelm DubuissonMinistère de la Santé et de Services sociaux du Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Guillaume SillonMinistère de la Santé et de Services sociaux du Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9573-1209
Danielle BergeronMinistère de la Santé et de Services sociaux du Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Stéphane GroulxMinistère de la Santé et de Services sociaux du Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Wilber DeckCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de la Gaspésie, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6159-5621
Anik GiguèreVITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9928-7395
France LégaréUnité de soutien SSA Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-6696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision aids (DA) are more likely to be adopted if co-developed with stakeholders and culturally adapted. Using the DEVELOPTOOLS Reporting Checklist, we describe a process for rapid co-development of a culturally adapted DA prototype for population-wide cancer-screening programs. Our systematic, collaborative, and iterative methodology had 7 phases: 1) set up the process by adopting best governance practices (e.g., identify and engage stakeholders, adapt our collaborative DA design process, validate development process), with governance comprising 20 individuals from a wide range of sectors including at least 2 citizens; 2) identify and analyze existing DAs relevant to the cancerscreening of interest by conducting a systematic review; 3) share results with stakeholders and make recommendations; 4) formulate Quebec-specific DA content and consult stakeholders including users by conducting e-Delphi surveys; 5) co-design a prototype with stakeholders, including users, following international DA standards; 6) translate the DA using translation-back translation approaches and deploy; and 7) knowledge mobilization (KMb) using end-of-grant and integrated KMb activities. Using the User-Centred Design 11-Item Measure (UCD-11), our proposed process scored 10 of 11 on the UCD-11. Overall, we expect this new co-developed process to ensure that good-quality, user-centered, and culturally adapted DAs for cancer screening are produced within reasonable timeframes. We also expect it to foster the adoption of the DAs.HighlightsWe report on a 7-step process for collaborating with various stakeholders to create a culturally adapted decision aid (DA) prototype for deciding about cancer screening in Quebec, Canada.The process includes: ○ Making sure the DA prototype design includes users and other interested parties and reflects their needs, perceptions, values, and preferences.○ Finding and analyzing existing DAs on cancer screening to decide what ours should include○ Respecting international standards and criteria for DA design○ Repeated rounds of expert consensus about the exact content, with revisions between each roundThis method could help the rapid creation of DAs shaped by users' interests and will ultimately encourage shared decision making.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningNeoplasmsHumansQuebecco-developmentculturally adapteddecision aidprocessQuebecrapidshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID40657730
PMCPMC12413505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.