Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657707›Full record

ReviewNutrition reviews2025

Clinical Benefits and Safety of Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation During Preconception, Pregnancy, and Lactation: A Review.

Jue Liu, Konstantinos Mantantzis, Ligaya Kaufmann, Zigor Campos Goenaga, Olga Gromova, Keiji Kuroda, Hongbo Qi, Nana Tetruashvili, Gian Carlo Di Renzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jue LiuDepartment of Regulatory, Medical, Safety, Quality & Compliance (RMSQC), Bayer Healthcare Company Limited, 200126 Shanghai, China.
Konstantinos MantantzisDepartment of Regulatory, Medical, Safety, Quality & Compliance (RMSQC), Bayer Consumer Care AG, 4052 Basel, Switzerland.
Ligaya KaufmannDepartment of Regulatory, Medical, Safety, Quality & Compliance (RMSQC), Bayer Consumer Care AG, 4052 Basel, Switzerland.
Zigor Campos GoenagaUMAE HGO4 Luis Castelazo Ayala, Tizapan San Ángel, 01090 Mexico City, Mexico.
Olga GromovaFRCCSC RAS - Federal Research Center Computer Sciences and Control Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Keiji KurodaSugiyama Clinic Marunouchi, Center for Reproductive Medicine and Endoscopy, Tokyo, 100-0005, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2759-9159
Hongbo QiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 400016 Chongqing, China.
Nana TetruashviliAcademician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Gian Carlo Di RenzoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatal Medicine, IM Sechenov First State University, 117630 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

BayerBayer employeesBayer Healthcare Company Limited
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this review we sought to determine the clinical benefits and safety of a multiple micronutrient supplement/supplementation (MMS) throughout preconception, pregnancy, and lactation in the mother and their child.

backgroundNo guidelines for pregnancy specifically recommend supplementation with micronutrients other than folic acid and iron or continuing the use of MMS beyond the first trimester. Yet micronutrients are essential during all stages of pregnancy for healthy fetal growth and development and maternal health, with an increased intake of many micronutrients recommended during pregnancy and lactation. The MMS reviewed (Elevit, Bayer) is the most studied prenatal form of MMS, supported by 30 publications reporting studies conducted worldwide over 30 years and used by millions of women over a period of 40 years. Until now, the data have not yet been consolidated.

methodsWe performed a literature search to identify published studies for trials that used MMS at any stage of the pregnancy journey.

resultsOutcomes reported in 30 trials suggested that MMS improves micronutrient status, leads to a healthier reproductive environment during preconception, and can significantly reduce neural tube defects and congenital abnormalities in early pregnancy above and beyond supplementation with folic acid alone. We also found that MMS can reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes during the second and third trimesters, including miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, anemia, preterm birth, and placental insufficiency, and improve docosahexaenoic acid status. In addition, MMS improves the quality of breastmilk and reduces postpartum depression. Using MMS containing 800 μg folic acid is more effective than supplementing with 400 μg folic acid alone. Very few adverse events were reported in infants, almost all of which were considered unrelated to MMS intake. In one cohort, periconceptual MMS in children was linked to higher rates of otitis media and atopic dermatitis than placebo, but these results may be partly attributed to multiple hypothesis testing and differences in family history, respectively.

conclusionImproving micronutrient status with MMS in women who are trying to conceive, pregnant, or breastfeeding may have beneficial effects on fertility, the integrity of the embryonic environment, development of the embryonic brain and nervous system, and the growth, development, and long-term health of the child.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsLactationMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMicronutrientsPreconception CareFemaleFolic AcidHumansNeural Tube DefectsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeFolic AcidMicronutrientsadverse pregnancy outcomesbirth defectsmultiple micronutrient supplementationpreconceptionpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40657707
PMCPMC12603366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.