ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2025
Weighing the predictive role of neural factors for adolescent anhedonia in the presence of demographic and clinical factors.
Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anhedonia, a transdiagnostic symptom of psychopathology associated with pernicious clinical course, has putative mechanisms in neural reward systems and emerges during adolescence. However, the relative contributions of neural, demographic, and clinical factors to its development are unclear. 73 adolescents (13-19 years) at varying familial risk for developing anhedonia reported demographic and clinical characteristics at study entry, reported anhedonia up to three times annually, and underwent fMRI during a monetary reward paradigm. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, which allows for a large number of intercorrelated predictors for feature selection, revealed that among demographic, clinical, and neural factors, 10 features predicted peak anhedonia over two years: impulsivity; activation in dorsal caudate, sub-gyral temporal lobe, and cuneus; and negative FC between the ventral striatum and six regions implicated in motor and/or decision-making aspects of reward. Neural factors explained an additional 40 % of variance above impulsivity. Findings indicate that in adolescents at risk for severe mental illness, disrupted motor and decision-making reward pathways could contribute to the development of anhedonia. Additionally, anhedonia should be defined in multiple domains, beyond mere phenomenology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.