ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
Geographical variation in physician supply and its relationship to utilization of care across older adults in the United States.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten high-priority areas for health policy research in 2026-2027.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Share Of Physicians With J-1 Visas Training In The US Increased Steadily, 2016-24.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Scholars express concern that general practitioner shortages and specialist surpluses induce overspecialization, with overuse of costly specialist services and underuse of cost-effective primary care services. Yet few studies directly assess the relationship between physician supply and patient utilization. Given this gap, this paper examines the associations between physician supply, care utilization, and patient need and whether patients use more specialists in areas with lower primary care supply. Methods: Using a 20% sample of 2018 Medicare fee-for-service claims, this paper first assessed the correlation between county physician densities and county physician visits. It then modeled individual patient consumption of primary and specialty care services in relation to physician supply through linear regression, adjusting for health and demographics. Results: While county supplies of primary care practitioners (PCPs) and specialists were positively correlated, we found no correlation between local PCP supply and local primary care visits. We also found no evidence that patients substitute specialist care for primary care, even in areas with PCP shortages. Conclusion: These findings suggest that factors other than PCP supply play an important role in primary care underuse. Scholars should also consider how care models, limited gatekeeping, and excess consumption among well-resourced populations influence the distribution of primary care utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.