ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2025
Automated Evaluation of Urodynamic Examinations Through Local Linear Models: Validation on Spinal Cord Injury Individuals.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for urodynamic studies: systematic review of methods, performance, and clinical applications.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and spinal cord injury: current status, emerging technologies, and ethical perspectives.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveInvestigating consistent methods and metrics for classifying Detrusor Overactivity (DO) events and developing an automated robust method for clinical measurements calculation from cystometry data in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A two-stage method for was proposed to detect DO events. In the first stage, DO peaks were detected using local linear models combined with thresholding criteria derived from clinical definitions and known artifacts. In the second stage, a segmentation method was proposed to detect the start and end time points of each DO event, marking the DO activity periods. As a result, complete clinical measurements, including bladder compliance, can be estimated automatically. The method was developed and tested on 77 anonymized urodynamic samples from SCI individuals (40 DO-positive, 37 DO-negative) with 158 annotated DO events.
resultsOn test data, in terms of the patient-level diagnosis of DO, the proposed method achieved an accuracy of 100%. Individual DO event detection achieved an average precision of 0.94 and recall of 0.72. Detrusor activity period identification showed a precision of 0.86 and a recall of 0.88. The task of automated bladder compliance estimation showed that the point-value-based method yields a lower median absolute error (MAE) compared to the proposed line-fitting-based method, with a MAE of 5.20 and 7.14 ml/cmH2O, respectively. Finally, for classifying bladder function into normal, low and severely low compliance, the proposed method had an accuracy of 88%.
conclusionOur proposed local model fitting with thresholding based on clinical knowledge, achieved accurate automated results for cytometry data, which will enable objective assessment of routinely performed examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.