Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657529›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2025

Survival Prediction of Esophageal Cancer Using 3D CT Imaging: A Context-Aware Approach With Non-Local Feature Aggregation and Graph-Based Spatial Interaction.

Fuce Guo, Chen Huang, Shengmei Lin, Yongmei Dai, Qianshun Chen, Shu Zhang, Xunyu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fuce GuoCollege of Computer and Data ScienceFuzhou University Fuzhou 350025 China.ORCID 0009-0008-1191-6299
Chen HuangShengli Clinical Medical CollegeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Provincial HospitalFuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University Fuzhou 350001 China.
Shengmei LinShengli Clinical Medical CollegeDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Provincial HospitalFuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University Fuzhou 350001 China.
Yongmei DaiShengli Clinical Medical CollegeDepartment of Oncology, Fujian Provincial HospitalFuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University Fuzhou 350001 China.
Qianshun ChenShengli Clinical Medical CollegeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Provincial HospitalFuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University Fuzhou 350001 China.
Shu ZhangCollege of Computer and Data ScienceFuzhou University Fuzhou 350025 China.ORCID 0000-0002-3725-3461
Xunyu XuShengli Clinical Medical CollegeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Provincial HospitalFuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University Fuzhou 350001 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of survival rates in esophageal cancer (EC) is crucial for guiding personalized treatment decisions. Deep learning-based survival models have gained increasing attention due to their powerful ability to capture complex embeddings in medical data. However, the primary limitation of current frameworks for predicting survival lies in their lack of attention to the contextual interactions between tumor and lymph node regions, which are vital for survival predictions. In the current study, we aimed to develop an effective EC survival risk prediction using only 3D computed tomography (CT) images.The proposed model consists of two essential components: 1) non-local feature aggregation module(NFAM) that integrates visual features from tumor and lymph nodes at both local and global scales, 2) graph-based spatial interaction module(GSIM) that explores the latent contextual interactions between tumors and lymph nodes.The experimental results demonstrate that our model achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art survival prediction methods, emphasizing its robust predictive capability. Moreover, we found that retaining lymph nodes with major axis [Formula: see text]mm yields the best predictive results (C-index: 0.725), offering valuable guidance on choosing prognostic factors for esophageal cancer.For EC survival prediction using solely 3D CT images, integrating lymph node information with tumor information helps to improve the predictive performance of deep learning models.Clinical impact: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (TNM) classification serves as the primary framework for risk stratification, prognostic evaluation, and therapeutic decision-making in oncology. Nevertheless, this prognostic tool has demonstrated limited predictive accuracy in assessing long-term survival for esophageal carcinoma patients undergoing multimodal therapeutic regimens. Notably, even among those categorized within identical staging parameters, significant outcome heterogeneity persists, with survival trajectories diverging substantially across clinically matched populations. Our model serves as a complementary tool to the TNM staging system. By stratifying patients into distinct risk categories, this approach enables accurate prognosis assessment and provides critical guidance for postoperative adjuvant therapy decisions (such as whether to administer adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy), thereby facilitating personalized treatment recommendations.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsImaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisComputed tomographydeep learningesophageal cancersurvival prediction

Identifiers

PMID40657529
PMCPMC12251060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.