ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2025
A Practical Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Method for Upper Limb Inertial Motion Capture in a Clinical Setting.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Motion-Driven Automatic IMU Orientation Calibration viaSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inertial sensors have the potential to be a useful clinical tool because they can facilitate human motion capture outside the research setting. A major barrier to the widespread application of inertial motion capture is the lack of accepted calibration methods for ensuring accuracy, in particular the lack of a common convention for calculating the rotational offset of the sensors, known as sensor-to-segment calibration. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a sensor-to-segment calibration method for upper limb motion capture which is practical for clinical applications.We developed a calibration method which depends mainly on the estimation of joint axes from arbitrary elbow motion, and partially on the design of custom attachment mounts to achieve physical alignment. With twenty healthy participants, we used OpenSim's inertial sensor workflow to calculate joint kinematics, and evaluated the accuracy of the method through comparison with optical motion capture.We found the new calibration method resulted in upper limb kinematics with a median RMS error of 5-8°, and a median correlation coefficient of 0.977-0.987, which was significantly more accurate than a static pose calibration (p-value < 0.001).This work has demonstrated a method of calibration which is practical for clinical applications because it is quick to perform and does not depend on the subject's ability to perform specific movements, or on the operator's ability to carefully place sensors.Clinical Impact: The calibration method proposed in this work is a realistic option for the translation of inertial sensor technology into everyday clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.