Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657514›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2025

Scaffold Biomaterials in the Development of Cultured Meat: A Review.

Su-Min Park, Ji-Hwan Ryoo, Hyuk Cheol Kwon, Sung Gu Han

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Bioreactor Design and Engineering for Cultivated Meat Manufacturing.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Su-Min ParkDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9984-8078
Ji-Hwan RyooDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5349-5254
Hyuk Cheol KwonDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-2530
Sung Gu HanDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1485-861X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultured meat offers a sustainable and ethical solution to the environmental and food security challenges associated with conventional meat production. In cultured meat production, scaffolds play an important role as structural and biochemical supports for cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. The selection of biomaterials directly influences cellular processes and consequently shape the texture, flavor, and overall quality of the cultivated meat. This review provides a comprehensive overview of biomaterials employed in cultured meat scaffolds, encompassing sources such as animals, plants, algae, and microorganisms. The strengths and limitations of each biomaterial type are critically analyzed to guide scaffold fabrication strategies. Furthermore, potential applications are explored to address the constraints of individual biomaterials. Animal-derived biomaterials improve cell adhesion and biocompatibility by imitating extracellular substrates but are limited by high cost and low mechanical strength. Although plant-derived biomaterials are cost-effective and biodegradable, their mechanical strength and biocompatibility should be enhanced through chemical modification or combination with other biomaterials. Algae-derived biomaterials provide gelling properties but lack cell-binding sites and mechanical stability. Microbial-derived biomaterials provide high mechanical strength, while the lack of nutritional value and cell-binding sites limits their application in scaffold fabrication. Each biomaterial possesses unique properties, presenting both advantages and disadvantages. By leveraging their strengths, individual biomaterials can serve as effective sources for scaffold construction. An understanding their strengths, limitations, and suitability is crucial for designing and fabricating optimal scaffolds, ultimately enabling the successful production of cultured meat.

Indexed as

biomaterialcell differentiationcell proliferationcultured meatscaffold

Identifiers

PMID40657514
PMCPMC12246907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.